New Publication: Little Bustard densities!

Santangeli A, Pes M, Cardillo A, ... Rotger A. (2025). The importance of extensively managed grasslands and protected areas for a flagship steppe bird, the Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax, on a Mediterranean island. Bird Conservation International. 35:e39. doi:10.1017/S095927092510035X

In a shell: A new study surveyed the relict, isolated Little Bustard population on Sardinia. It found low overall densities, with most birds concentrated in just two subpopulations, The findings emphasize that conserving extensively managed grasslands and strengthening protected-area management are critical to prevent further declines.

Abstract: "The Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax has experienced steep population declines across its range, with Sardinia now hosting the last remaining Italian population and the only island population worldwide. We conducted a systematic island-wide survey in 2023, based on 969 point-count data, analysed through robust distance sampling, to assess population density, spatial distribution, habitat associations, and the role of protected areas. We estimated a total density of 0.89 males/km², with 85% of individuals concentrated in two highland subpopulations, i.e. Ozieri and Abbasanta.

 

 Highest densities occurred in hay meadows and heterogeneous landscapes, while arable and fallow lands supported lower densities. Protected areas hosted five times higher densities of Little Bustard than unprotected land. Land-use changes over the past 13 years and current soil degradation showed no significant association with current densities, suggesting that declines may be linked to earlier landscape transformations. Our results underscore the critical importance of protected areas and traditional agropastoral systems for the conservation of the Little Bustard in Sardinia. Urgent conservation planning is needed to maintain existing habitats and mitigate emerging threats from land-use change and infrastructure expansion."

 

 

New publication on the effect of protected areas!

Santangeli, A., Weigel, B., Antão, L.H. et al. Mixed effects of a national protected area network on terrestrial and freshwater biodiversity. Nat Commun 14, 5426 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41073-4

In a shell: Only a small fraction of species benefits of protected areas and it is not linked to species traits or conservation status. This indicates that additional measures like expanding coverage, enhancing connectivity, and better management are essential to address the broader biodiversity crisis effectively.

Abstract: Protected areas are considered fundamental to counter biodiversity loss. However, evidence for their effectiveness in averting local extinctions remains scarce and taxonomically biased. We employ a robust counterfactual multi-taxon approach to compare occupancy patterns of 638 species, including birds (150), mammals (23), plants (39) and phytoplankton (426) between protected and unprotected sites across four decades in Finland. We find mixed impacts of protected areas, with only a small proportion of species explicitly benefiting from protection—mainly through slower rates of decline inside protected areas. The benefits of protection are enhanced for larger protected areas and are traceable to when the sites were protected, but are mostly unrelated to species conservation status or traits (size, climatic niche and threat status). Our results suggest that the current protected area network can partly contribute to slow down declines in occupancy rates, but alone will not suffice to halt the biodiversity crisis. Efforts aimed at improving coverage, connectivity and management will be key to enhance the effectiveness of protected areas towards bending the curve of biodiversity loss.