Arrondo,
E., Moleón, M., Cortés-Avizanda, A., Jiménez, J., Beja, P., Sánchez-Zapata,
J.A, Donázar, J.A. 2018. Invisible barriers: Differential sanitary regulations constrain vulture movements across country borders. Biological
Conservation, 219: 46-52. doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.12.039
Abstract: Political boundaries may represent ecological barriers due to
differences in wildlife management policies. In the European Union, it
might be expected that these differences should be highly diluted,
because all countries have to comply with common directives issued by
the European Commission. However, the subsidiarity principle may lead to
the uneven uptake of European Union regulations, which can impact on
biodiversity conservation due to unequal legislation in neighboring
countries, particularly in the case of highly mobile organisms.
|
Photo: M. Gomila (@miknuk) |
Here we
address this issue, by analyzing how EU regulations issued in response
to the Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) crisis differentially
affected vulture conservation in Portugal and Spain.
Gyps fulvus) and 11 cinereous vultures (
Aegypius monachus)
from Spain, we found that the Spanish-Portuguese border acts as a
quasi-impermeable barrier. In fact, there was an abrupt decline in the
number of vulture locations across the Spanish-Portuguese border, with
modelling showing that this was unlikely to be related to differences in
land cover or topography. Instead, the pattern found was likely due to
differences in trophic resource availability, namely carcasses from
extensive livestock husbandry, resulting from the differential
application of European sanitary legislation regarding the mandatory
removal of dead livestock from the field. Overall, our results should be
seen as a warning signal to policy makers and conservation managers,
highlighting the need for a stronger integration of sanitary and
environmental policies at the European level.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.